L–Materials Selection and Contamination Control for Frequency Doubling Cavities

How to enable long-lasting performance.

Purpose and Scope

Target audience: BSc, MSc, and PhD students building SHG/THG/FHG laser systems Application: External ring cavities for frequency doubling (particularly NIR to VIS and VIS to UV) Critical context: Nonlinear crystals (LBO, BBO) operate at elevated temperatures (50-100°C) with entrance/exit surfaces exposed to ambient air, creating direct contamination pathways

Learning objective: Understand how materials choices and surface preparation affect long-term optical performance, and implement contamination control protocols that enable months-to-years of stable operation.

Executive Summary: The Contamination Problem

Why This Matters

When generating UV light (particularly <300 nm), even trace organic contamination on crystal surfaces causes:

  1. Progressive power loss: 10-50% degradation over 100-1000 hours

  2. Photochemical damage: UV photons (4.4 eV @ 280 nm) break C-H bonds → polymerization on surfaces

  3. Thermal runaway: Contaminated surfaces absorb more → heat → more contamination

  4. Experimental failure: Cannot maintain stable cavity lock, data becomes unreliable

The Core Mechanism

[Organic materials in cavity] 
    ↓ (outgassing: molecules enter air)
[Thermal convection from hot crystal]
    ↓ (transport to crystal surface)
[50-100°C surface temperature]
    ↓ (condensation: "sweet spot" for deposition)
[280 nm UV photons + O₂]
    ↓ (photochemistry: polymerization)
[Absorbing polymer layer on crystal]
    ↓ (feedback loop: absorption → heating → more outgassing)
[System failure]

Critical insight: Even "clean" laboratory air contains enough organic molecules that, when concentrated by thermal gradients and polymerized by UV, will contaminate your crystals in weeks to months without proper mitigation.

What You'll Learn

  1. Source identification: Which materials in your cavity are contamination sources (ranked by severity)

  2. Material selection: What to use, what to avoid, and why (with specific product recommendations)

  3. Surface preparation: Cleaning and baking protocols that reduce outgassing by 1,000-10,000×

  4. Performance expectations: Realistic timelines for crystal lifetime based on your choices

  5. Monitoring and maintenance: How to detect contamination early and establish cleaning cycles

Part 1: Contamination Source Ranking

The Contamination Budget Concept

Total contamination rate = Σ(Surface area × Outgassing rate × Proximity factor × UV exposure factor)

Your goal: Reduce total contamination rate to <10⁻⁹ Torr·L/s for multi-month operation.

Source 1: Black Anodized Aluminum (CRITICAL - AVOID)

Risk Level: 🔴 CRITICAL (Dominant contamination source: 60-70% of total)

What It Is

  • Aluminum with porous Al₂O₃ surface layer

  • Dyed with organic pigments (azo compounds, anthraquinones)

  • Sealed with polymer coating (acrylic or epoxy-based)

Why It's Problematic

Property
Value
Impact

Outgassing rate

10⁻⁶ to 10⁻⁵ Torr·L/s/cm²

100-1000× higher than acceptable

Surface area

200-500 cm² (typical stage)

Large emission source

Dye volatility

Evaporates at 50-80°C

Releases colored organics continuously

UV interaction

Black absorbs UV → local heating

Accelerates outgassing near beam paths

Typical lifetime impact: Reduces BBO lifetime from 5,000 hours → 50-100 hours

Physical Mechanism

  1. Thermal desorption: Organic dyes have vapor pressure ~10⁻⁶ Torr at room temp

  2. Sealer degradation: Polymer sealers continuously release small molecules (monomers, solvents)

  3. UV photodegradation: 280 nm breaks dye molecules → gaseous products

  4. Transport: Convection currents carry organics to hot BBO surface (50°C)

  5. Deposition: Organics condense preferentially on 50°C surface (thermal sweet spot)

  6. Polymerization: UV + O₂ + organic deposits → cross-linked polymer film

Evidence: Commercial UV laser manufacturers explicitly prohibit black anodized aluminum near beam paths [1].

Decision: AVOID - Replace with Alternatives

MANDATORY REPLACEMENT if black anodized within 20 cm of BBO/LBO crystals.

Alternative A: Natural (Clear) Hard Anodization (Type III) ✅ RECOMMENDED - Best balance of performance and cost

  • Composition: Thick Al₂O₃ layer (50-100 μm), no organic dyes

  • Sealing: Hot water seal (converts Al₂O₃ to AlOOH) - inorganic process

  • Color: Clear/silver or light gold (from oxide thickness only)

  • Outgassing: <10⁻⁹ Torr·L/s/cm² (1,000× better than black)

  • Cost: Similar to black anodization

  • Suppliers: Most anodization shops can provide "clear hard coat"

Specification for procurement:

Alternative B: Bare Machined Aluminum ✅ ACCEPTABLE - Lowest cost

  • Leave natural mill finish or bead blast for uniform appearance

  • Protective coating: Clear conversion coating (Alodine/Iridite) - chromate-based, inorganic

  • Outgassing: <10⁻⁹ Torr·L/s/cm² (excellent)

  • Appearance: Industrial/unfinished look

  • Risk: May oxidize (white powdery corrosion) in humid environments

Alternative C: Electropolished Stainless Steel ✅ BEST - Premium option

  • Material: 304 or 316 stainless steel

  • Surface: Electropolished (Ra < 0.4 μm, mirror-like finish)

  • Outgassing: <10⁻¹⁰ Torr·L/s/cm² (best available)

  • Cost: 2-3× more than aluminum (material + machining)

  • Weight: ~3× heavier than aluminum

  • Used in: LIGO, synchrotron beamlines, UHV systems

Alternative D: Anodized Aluminum (Existing Parts) - Bake-Out Treatment ⚠️ CONDITIONAL - Only if replacement not feasible

Protocol for "cleaning" existing black anodized parts:

When to use this: Emergency repair, budget-constrained projects, or low-criticality applications.

Procurement Guidance

Recommended vendors for clean aluminum stages:

  • Thorlabs: Custom optomechanics in natural anodized or stainless

  • OptoSigma: "Clean room grade" stages (specify no black anodization)

  • Newport: Stainless steel or natural anodized options available

  • Custom fabrication: Local machine shop + anodization service

Cost comparison (per linear stage, ~20 cm travel):

  • Black anodized (commercial): €300-600

  • Natural anodized: €300-650 (comparable)

  • Stainless steel: €800-1,500 (premium)

  • Bare aluminum (custom): €200-400 (budget)

References

[1] Coherent Inc., "UV Laser System Installation Guide" (2018) - Prohibits organic materials within 50 cm of <300 nm beam paths [2] Rettner et al., "Contamination of optical surfaces by organic vapors," Appl. Opt. 26, 3402 (1987) [3] LIGO Technical Note T1500200, "Materials for use in LIGO vacuum systems"

Source 2: Machining Oil Residues (CRITICAL - CLEAN)

Risk Level: 🔴 CRITICAL (Second largest source: 10-20% of total)

What It Is

"Invisible contamination" - microscopic oil films from manufacturing processes:

  • Cutting fluids from CNC machining

  • Drawing compounds from metal forming

  • Anti-seize compounds on threads

  • Fingerprint oils from handling

  • Protective oils applied during shipping

Key insight: Even visually "clean" parts have 0.1-10 μm oil films (molecular to microscopic scale).

Why It's Problematic

Property
Value
Impact

Outgassing rate

10⁻⁶ to 10⁻⁵ Torr·L/s/cm²

Same as black anodization

Surface coverage

50-200 cm² (all machined parts)

Every threaded hole, every surface

Vapor pressure

High at room temp

Volatile even without heating

UV reactivity

Extreme - hydrocarbons photopolymerize readily

Direct precursors to surface deposits

Physical properties of typical machining oils:

  • Composition: Long-chain hydrocarbons (C₁₅-C₃₅), additives (sulfur, chlorine compounds)

  • Boiling point: 300-400°C (but vapor pressure is significant at room temp)

  • UV absorption: Strong at 280 nm (σ ≈ 10⁻¹⁸ cm²)

Detection

Simple test (for training/demonstration):

Quantitative test:

  • Wipe surface with clean white lint-free wipe

  • Inspect wipe under UV lamp (365 nm) - oil fluoresces bright blue

  • Or: Weigh wipe before/after → mass of oil extracted

Decision: MANDATORY CLEANING PROTOCOL

NO EXCEPTIONS: All metal parts within 30 cm of crystals must be ultrasonically cleaned and baked before installation.

Protocol: 3-Stage Ultrasonic Cleaning + Thermal Bake

Time investment: ~4 hours per batch of parts (mostly unattended) Cost: €50-200 for solvents + oven time (one-time for each assembly) Benefit: 100-1,000× reduction in outgassing from machined parts

Special Cases

Springs and Washers:

  • Often have anti-corrosion oils that survive normal cleaning

  • Enhanced protocol: Bake at 300°C / 1 hour (burns off oils completely)

  • Verify spring constant unchanged after bake (measure force-displacement curve)

Threaded Parts:

  • Threads are hard to clean (large surface area, crevices)

  • After ultrasonic cleaning, thread with clean brass wire brush to mechanically remove residues

  • Bake as normal

Anodized Parts:

  • Porous anodization layer can absorb oils during machining

  • Ultrasonic cleaning helps but doesn't fully extract

  • Baking at 150-200°C drives out absorbed oils

What NOT To Do

❌ "Wipe clean with IPA cloth" - Spreads oil, doesn't remove it ❌ Skip baking step - Cleaning removes bulk oils but not molecular films ❌ Use contaminated cleaning baths - Replace solvents regularly ❌ Handle cleaned parts with bare hands - Fingerprints re-contaminate instantly ❌ Apply lubricants after cleaning - Defeats the entire purpose

Expected Improvement

Treatment
Outgassing Rate
BBO Lifetime Impact

As received from supplier

10⁻⁶ Torr·L/s/cm²

50-100 hours

Ultrasonic cleaned only

10⁻⁷ Torr·L/s/cm²

200-500 hours

Cleaned + 200°C bake

10⁻⁹ Torr·L/s/cm²

3,000-5,000 hours

Return on investment: 4 hours cleaning → 50-100× lifetime increase

References

[4] Palik & Henck, "Effect of cleaning procedures on the damage threshold of molybdenum mirrors," Appl. Opt. 23, 3796 (1984) [5] NASA SP-R-0022A, "Vacuum stability requirements of polymers" - Section on cleaning protocols [6] Agrawal & Menzel, "Contamination of grazing incidence optics," Opt. Eng. 32, 1593 (1993)

Source 3: Piezoelectric Actuator Stacks (MODERATE - MITIGATE)

Risk Level: 🟠 MODERATE (5-10% of total contamination)

What It Is

Internal structure of piezo stack:

Hidden organics:

  • Inter-layer epoxy: Silver-filled epoxy bonds ceramic disks

  • Wire insulation: PVC, PTFE, or polyimide (Kapton)

  • Strain relief: Silicone rubber or epoxy potting at wire exit

  • Coatings: Polyurethane, epoxy, or acrylic moisture barriers

Why It's Problematic

Outgassing pathways:

  1. Diffusion through grain boundaries: PZT ceramic is polycrystalline with micron-scale grains

  2. Permeation through electrodes: Thin (1-10 μm) metal electrodes are not perfect barriers

  3. Edge emission: Epoxy layers exposed at cut edges of piezo stack

  4. Wire junction: Largest emission area - strain relief directly exposed

Outgassing rates (typical multilayer piezo):

  • Total surface area: 2-10 cm² (depending on size)

  • Fresh piezo: 10⁻⁷ Torr·L/s/cm² (similar to unbaked epoxy)

  • After 100 hours room-temp aging: 10⁻⁸ Torr·L/s/cm²

  • After pre-bake: 10⁻⁹ to 10⁻¹⁰ Torr·L/s/cm²

Temperature dependence:

  • At room temp (20°C): Low outgassing

  • Near hot oven (thermal gradient creates 40-60°C on back side): 10× higher outgassing

  • Critical: Even though piezo is at "room temp," thermal radiation from 94°C LBO oven can heat nearby piezos

Material Variability

Commercial piezo stacks vary widely in cleanliness:

Manufacturer
Grade
Typical Application
Outgassing @ 25°C
UHV Compatible?

Physik Instrumente (PI)

Standard

General lab use

10⁻⁷ Torr·L/s

❌ No

PI Ceramic

PICMA® Chip

Precision positioning

10⁻⁸ Torr·L/s

⚠️ Marginal

PI Ceramic

PICMA® Bender

UHV-specified

10⁻⁹ Torr·L/s

✅ Yes

Thorlabs

Standard PA series

General optomechanics

10⁻⁷ Torr·L/s

❌ No

Noliac

NAC2000 series

Industrial

10⁻⁷ Torr·L/s

❌ No

Noliac

NAC2000-UHV

Vacuum-specified

10⁻⁹ Torr·L/s

✅ Yes

Custom builds

Varies

Depends on specification

Variable

Specify outgassing requirement

Cost difference: UHV-grade piezos typically 2-3× price of standard grade

Specification keywords for procurement:

Decision Framework

Scenario A: New piezo purchase (project start)

✅ RECOMMENDED: Specify UHV-grade piezos from start

  • Example: PI PICMA® Bender actuators with UHV option

  • Example: Noliac NAC2000-UHV series

  • Cost increment: +€100-300 per piezo

  • Benefit: No pre-bake required, plug-and-play

Scenario B: Existing standard-grade piezos

✅ ACCEPTABLE: Pre-bake + encapsulation protocol (see below)

  • Can achieve similar performance to UHV-grade with treatment

  • Saves cost if piezos already purchased

Scenario C: Budget-constrained / rapid prototyping

⚠️ CONDITIONAL: Use standard piezos with partial mitigation

  • Accept shorter BBO lifetime (1,000-2,000 hours instead of 5,000+)

  • Plan for more frequent BBO cleaning cycles

  • Document degradation rate for future budget justification

Mitigation Protocol: Pre-Bake and Encapsulation

MANDATORY for standard-grade piezos, OPTIONAL for UHV-grade

Performance comparison:

Treatment
Piezo Outgassing
Contribution to BBO Contamination

Untreated standard piezo

5×10⁻⁷ Torr·L/s

5-10% of total

Pre-bake only

5×10⁻⁸ Torr·L/s

1-2% of total

Pre-bake + encapsulation

5×10⁻⁹ Torr·L/s

<0.5% of total

UHV-grade (no treatment)

5×10⁻⁹ Torr·L/s

<0.5% of total

Electrical Considerations

Wire insulation choices:

Material

Outgassing @ 25°C

Temperature Rating

UV Resistance

Recommendation

PVC

10⁻⁵ Torr·L/s/cm²

80°C

Poor (yellows)

❌ AVOID

Silicone rubber

10⁻⁷ Torr·L/s/cm²

200°C

Good

⚠️ ACCEPTABLE (with pre-bake)

PTFE (Teflon)

10⁻⁹ Torr·L/s/cm²

260°C

Excellent

✅ GOOD

Kapton (polyimide)

10⁻¹⁰ Torr·L/s/cm²

400°C

Excellent

✅ BEST

Decision:

  • If wire already has PVC insulation: Replace with PTFE or Kapton before installing in cavity

  • If wire has silicone: Pre-bake at 150°C × 24 hours, then acceptable

  • For new wiring: Use PTFE or Kapton-insulated wire from start

Vendors for clean wire:

  • Omega Engineering: Kapton-insulated wire (28-36 AWG)

  • Alpha Wire: FIT-221 PTFE insulated wire

  • Allectra: UHV-compatible wiring kits

Monitoring Piezo Health

Pre- and post-bake measurements (critical for quality control):

Accept/reject criteria:

  • Capacitance change <5%: ✅ Pass

  • Capacitance change 5-10%: ⚠️ Caution (may have reduced lifetime)

  • Capacitance change >10%: ❌ Reject (internal delamination likely)

References

[7] Setter & Waser, "Electroceramic materials," Acta Mater. 48, 151 (2000) - Piezo internal structure [8] PI Ceramic, "Piezo actuators for UHV applications," Application Note (2019) [9] Bernardini et al., "Outgassing properties of piezoelectric actuators," Vacuum 73, 347 (2004)

Source 4: Adhesive Bonds (LOW - IF PROPERLY TREATED)

Risk Level: 🟡 LOW (<1% of total contamination after proper treatment)

This was discussed extensively in previous sections. Key points summary:

Materials Comparison

Adhesive

Outgassing (unbaked)

Outgassing (baked)

Thermal Conductivity

Use Case

EPO-TEK 353ND

10⁻⁷ Torr·L/s/cm²

10⁻¹² Torr·L/s/cm²

~0.3 W/mK

Mirror-to-piezo (thin bondline)

EPO-TEK H74

10⁻⁷ Torr·L/s/cm²

10⁻¹² Torr·L/s/cm²

1.3 W/mK

Thermistor-to-oven (thermal coupling)

Stycast 2850FT

10⁻⁷ Torr·L/s/cm²

10⁻¹² Torr·L/s/cm²

1.28 W/mK

High-voltage piezo bonds

Ceramabond 571

10⁻¹⁰ Torr·L/s/cm²

Not needed

1.4 W/mK

Inorganic alternative (thermistor)

Mandatory Post-Cure Bake

Standard protocol (after 150°C / 1 hour cure):

Without this bake: Adhesives contribute 5-10% to contamination With bake: Adhesives contribute <0.5% to contamination

Decision: EPO-TEK 353ND for mirror bonds, H74 for thermistor bonds, with mandatory extended bake.

Source 5: PEEK Insulators (LOW - ACCEPTABLE)

Risk Level: 🟢 LOW (2-5% of total contamination)

What It Is

  • Polyetheretherketone: High-performance thermoplastic

  • Used for: Thermal insulation between hot ovens and cavity mounts, electrical insulation

  • Chemical structure: Aromatic rings with ether linkages (very stable)

Why It's Acceptable

Property
Value
Assessment

Outgassing @ 25°C

10⁻⁹ to 10⁻⁸ Torr·L/s/cm²

100× better than PVC, similar to PTFE

NASA ASTM E595

TML <1%, CVCM <0.1%

Passes with margin

Temperature rating

Continuous use to 250°C

Far exceeds cavity temps (50-94°C)

UV resistance

Moderate (yellows slowly at 280 nm)

Acceptable if not in direct beam

Decision: ACCEPTABLE - Use As-Is

No replacement needed. PEEK is one of the best thermoplastic choices for this application.

Optional improvement: If baking adhesives anyway, PEEK benefits from simultaneous bake:

  • 150°C / 24 hours drives off absorbed moisture and any machining residues

  • Reduces outgassing by additional 5-10×

Alternatives (if PEEK unavailable):

  • Macor (machinable glass-ceramic): Zero outgassing, but brittle

  • Alumina (Al₂O₃): Excellent thermal properties, harder to machine

  • PTFE (Teflon): Similar outgassing, lower mechanical strength

References

[10] Victrex, "PEEK for aerospace and vacuum applications," Technical Data Sheet (2020) [11] NASA, "Materials selection for spaceflight applications" - Lists PEEK as approved material

Source 6: Cables and Connectors (LOW-MODERATE - SELECT CAREFULLY)

Risk Level: 🟡 LOW-MODERATE (3-8% depending on choices)

Cable Insulation Materials

Material

Outgassing @ 25°C

Flexibility

Temperature Rating

Cost

Recommendation

PVC

10⁻⁵ Torr·L/s/cm²

Excellent

80°C

Low

❌ AVOID

Silicone rubber

10⁻⁷ Torr·L/s/cm²

Excellent

200°C

Moderate

⚠️ ACCEPTABLE (pre-bake)

PTFE

10⁻⁹ Torr·L/s/cm²

Good

260°C

Moderate

✅ RECOMMENDED

Kapton

10⁻¹⁰ Torr·L/s/cm²

Poor (stiff)

400°C

High

✅ BEST (if flexibility not critical)

PVC problem:

  • Plasticizers (phthalates) continuously migrate to surface

  • High vapor pressure → rapid contamination

  • Common in commercial cables → often not specified clearly

Detection:

  • Look for "105°C rated" cable → usually PVC

  • "200°C rated" → usually silicone or PTFE

  • If unclear: Ask vendor for material specification

Decision: Replace PVC, Use PTFE or Kapton

Cable routing strategy:

Recommended cable suppliers:

  • Omega Engineering: Kapton-insulated thermocouple and instrument wire

  • Alpha Wire: FIT-221 PTFE hook-up wire (18-30 AWG)

  • Lakeshore Cryotronics: Quadlead wire (Kapton-insulated, designed for low outgassing)

  • Allectra: UHV-compatible cable assemblies with CF or SubD feedthroughs

Cost: €5-20 per meter (PTFE/Kapton) vs. €1-3 per meter (PVC)

Connectors

Avoid: Standard D-sub connectors with plastic housings (nylon, polycarbonate) Use: Metal-body connectors or UHV-compatible feedthroughs

Examples:

  • Fischer UHV series: All-metal connectors, bakeable

  • SubMiniature D (all-metal housing): Available from ITT Cannon, Amphenol

  • Lemo UHV series: Precision connectors for vacuum

Source 7: O-Rings and Seals (CRITICAL IF PRESENT - ELIMINATE)

Risk Level: 🔴 CRITICAL (if present within cavity enclosure)

Decision: DO NOT USE elastomer seals inside cavity enclosure

Problem:

  • Even "UHV-compatible" o-rings outgas at 10⁻⁷ Torr·L/s/cm²

  • Plasticizers, curatives, and mold release agents continuously desorb

  • Large surface area in contact with air

Alternative sealing methods:

Seal Type
Material
Outgassing
Cost
Application

Viton o-ring

Fluoroelastomer

10⁻⁷ Torr·L/s/cm²

Low

❌ Avoid in cavity

Kalrez® o-ring

Perfluoroelastomer

10⁻⁹ Torr·L/s/cm²

High

⚠️ OK if >30 cm from BBO

Metal C-ring

Stainless steel

10⁻¹¹ Torr·L/s/cm²

Moderate

✅ Preferred for vacuum

Conflat (CF) flange

Copper gasket

10⁻¹² Torr·L/s/cm²

Low

✅ Best for UHV

Indium wire

Indium metal

10⁻¹¹ Torr·L/s/cm²

Moderate

✅ Excellent for custom seals

If elastomer seals unavoidable:

  • Use Kalrez only (not Viton or Buna-N)

  • Pre-bake at 200°C / 48 hours

  • Keep >30 cm from crystals

Part 2: Material Selection Decision Tree

For Each Component in Your Cavity

Part 3: Assembly Protocol Summary

Pre-Assembly Phase (Week 1)

Day 1-2: Procurement verification

  • [ ] All metal parts are natural anodized, bare aluminum, or stainless (no black anodization)

  • [ ] All cables are PTFE or Kapton insulated (no PVC)

  • [ ] Piezos are UHV-grade or standard (to be pre-baked)

  • [ ] Adhesives: EPO-TEK 353ND, H74, or equivalent NASA-certified

  • [ ] No elastomer seals within 20 cm of crystals

Day 3-5: Cleaning protocol

  • [ ] Disassemble all metal hardware

  • [ ] Ultrasonic clean: Acetone → IPA → DI water (15 min each)

  • [ ] Thermal bake: 200°C / 2-4 hours in air

  • [ ] Dragon's breath verification test

  • [ ] Store in clean bags with desiccant

Day 6-7: Piezo pre-bake (if not UHV-grade)

  • [ ] Vacuum bake piezos: 80-100°C / 48-72 hours @ <10⁻⁴ Torr

  • [ ] Measure capacitance before/after (verify <5% change)

  • [ ] Store in clean dry environment until bonding

Assembly Phase (Week 2)

Day 1-3: Adhesive bonding

  • [ ] Bond mirrors to piezos (EPO-TEK 353ND per procedure)

  • [ ] Bond thermistors to ovens (EPO-TEK H74)

  • [ ] Standard cure: 150°C / 1 hour, ramp 2°C/min

Day 4: Extended post-cure

  • [ ] All bonded subassemblies: 150°C / 24 hours in air oven

  • [ ] Cool slowly to room temperature

Day 5-7: Vacuum bake (CRITICAL)

  • [ ] All subassemblies in vacuum oven: 100-120°C / 48-72 hours @ 10⁻⁵ Torr

  • [ ] RGA monitoring (if available): Verify <10⁻¹⁴ Torr·L/s background

  • [ ] If no RGA: Complete full 72-hour bake minimum

Day 7: Post-bake treatment

  • [ ] Cool to room temperature in vacuum

  • [ ] Vent with dry nitrogen (not room air)

  • [ ] Encapsulate piezos with Al foil + Kapton tape

  • [ ] Handle only with powder-free gloves

Integration Phase (Week 3)

Day 1-2: Mechanical assembly

  • [ ] Assemble cavity frame with cleaned hardware

  • [ ] Install piezo-mirror subassemblies

  • [ ] Install crystals in ovens (handle with tweezers, never touch with fingers)

  • [ ] Connect thermistors (verify resistance values)

  • [ ] Route cables (PTFE/Kapton only, >20 cm from crystals)

Day 3-4: Optical alignment

  • [ ] Align cavities at room temperature (crystals not yet heated)

  • [ ] Verify mode-matching

  • [ ] Test piezo response (check for mechanical resonances)

Day 5-7: Thermal commissioning

  • [ ] Gradually ramp oven temperatures (2°C/min)

  • [ ] LBO: 25°C → 94°C over 2 hours

  • [ ] BBO: 25°C → 50°C over 1 hour

  • [ ] Monitor cavity lock stability during warmup

  • [ ] Optimize phase-matching angles

Operation Phase (Week 4+)

Day 1: Power ramp-up

  • [ ] Start at 10% IR power (200 mW)

  • [ ] Step up: 200 → 500 → 1000 → 1500 → 1800 mW in 20% increments

  • [ ] Wait 5 minutes at each power level

  • [ ] Monitor: Temperature, green output, UV output

  • [ ] Lock cavity with polarization servo

Day 2-7: Performance verification

  • [ ] Measure and record:

    • IR input power: _____ W

    • Green output power: _____ W (efficiency: ____%)

    • UV output power: _____ mW (efficiency: ____%)

    • Cavity lock bandwidth: _____ kHz

    • Long-term power stability (1 hour): _____ % RMS

Ongoing: Contamination monitoring

  • [ ] Daily: Log UV power (create trend plot)

  • [ ] Weekly: Visual inspection of BBO (look for surface haze)

  • [ ] Monthly: Detailed performance characterization

  • [ ] Establish cleaning cycle when power drops >10%

Part 4: Performance Expectations and Monitoring

Expected BBO/LBO Lifetime by Scenario

Contamination Control Level
Estimated Hours to 10% Power Loss
Cleaning Interval
Research Viability

None (standard lab assembly)

50-100 hours

Every 1-2 weeks

❌ Not viable

Partial (cleaned but not baked)

300-500 hours

Every 1-2 months

⚠️ Short-term experiments only

Good (cleaned + baked adhesives)

1,000-2,000 hours

Every 3-6 months

✅ Adequate for most research

Excellent (full protocol, no N₂ purge)

3,000-5,000 hours

Every 6-12 months

✅ Publication-quality

Optimal (full protocol + N₂ purge)

8,000-15,000 hours

>1 year

✅ Commercial-grade

Conversion factors:

  • 1,000 hours = 42 days of continuous operation

  • 1,000 hours = 6 months at 40 hours/week (typical lab use)

Early Warning Signs of Contamination

Monitor these parameters weekly:

  1. UV output power (most sensitive indicator)

  2. Phase-matching temperature (indicates crystal absorption change)

  3. Cavity lock error signal RMS (indicates scatter)

  4. Visual inspection under microscope (definitive test)

BBO/LBO Cleaning Protocol

When to clean: Power dropped >10% AND visual inspection shows surface contamination

WARNING: Cleaning is invasive and carries risk of damage. Only clean when necessary.

Expected results:

  • Well-executed cleaning: 80-95% power recovery

  • Repeated cleanings: Diminishing returns (cumulative damage to coatings)

  • After 3-5 cleaning cycles: Consider replacing crystal

Part 5: Cost-Benefit Analysis

Investment vs. Lifetime Extension

Scenario: Building one frequency-doubling cavity (532 nm → 280 nm)

Expense Category
Standard Build
Clean Build
Premium Build

Material choices

Translation stages

€600 (black anodized)

€650 (natural anodized)

€1,200 (stainless)

Piezos (×2)

€300 (standard)

€300 (standard + bake)

€900 (UHV-grade)

Cables

€50 (PVC)

€150 (PTFE)

€150 (PTFE)

Adhesives

€50 (any epoxy)

€100 (EPO-TEK + bake)

€100 (EPO-TEK + bake)

Processing

Ultrasonic cleaning

€0 (skip)

€50 (solvents)

€50 (solvents)

Thermal baking

€0 (skip)

€100 (oven time)

€100 (oven time)

Vacuum baking

€0 (skip)

€200 (vacuum time)

€200 (vacuum time)

N₂ purge system

€0 (none)

€0 (none)

€800 (flow control + enclosure)

Labor time

1 week

3 weeks

3 weeks

TOTAL COST

€1,000

€1,550

€3,400

Performance

BBO lifetime

100 hours

3,000 hours

10,000 hours

Cleaning frequency

Weekly

Every 6 months

Yearly

Suitable for

Demos only

Publication work

Long-term stability

Effective cost per 1000 hrs

€10,000

€520

€340

Key insight: Clean build is 20× more cost-effective than standard build when amortized over crystal lifetime.

BBO crystal replacement cost: €500-2,000 (depending on size, coating, supplier)

Return on Investment Calculation

Example: PhD project requiring 2,000 hours of stable UV operation

Standard build approach:

Clean build approach:

ROI: 1,300% on the additional €550 investment in contamination control

Part 6: Troubleshooting Guide

Problem: UV power degrading rapidly (<100 hours to 50% loss)

Diagnostic steps:

  1. Check cavity lock: Is lock stable?

    • If lock unstable: Problem may be thermal drift, not contamination

    • If lock stable: Proceed to step 2

  2. Measure green power (559 nm): Is green also degrading?

    • If green stable but UV dropping: Problem is BBO contamination

    • If both dropping: Check LBO or cavity alignment

  3. Visual inspection of BBO:

    • Remove BBO, inspect at 50× magnification

    • Look for haze, discoloration, or particulates

    • If contamination visible: Proceed to cleaning protocol

    • If surfaces pristine: Problem is elsewhere (crystal damage, coating degradation)

  4. Identify contamination source:

    • When was last time cavity was opened? New component added?

    • Check for black anodized parts (most likely culprit)

    • Check for new cables (PVC insulation?)

    • Check for lubricants, adhesive labels, cleaning residues

Solutions by contamination source:

Source Identified
Immediate Action
Long-Term Solution

Black anodized stage

Remove or bake at 200°C × 48 hr

Replace with natural anodized

Machining oil residue

Ultrasonic clean + bake all parts

Implement cleaning protocol

Unbaked adhesive

Continue operation, expect further degradation

Rebuild with baked adhesives

PVC cable

Replace with PTFE

Cable management upgrade

Piezo outgassing

Encapsulate with Al foil

Use UHV-grade piezos

Problem: BBO lifetime shorter than expected despite following protocol

Possible explanations:

  1. Incomplete baking:

    • Verify vacuum bake reached <10⁻⁵ Torr (not just "vacuum pump on")

    • Verify temperature reached 100-120°C (use external thermocouple, don't trust oven display)

    • Verify bake duration was 48+ hours (not shortened)

  2. Contamination during assembly:

    • Were parts handled with bare hands after cleaning?

    • Was assembly done in dusty environment?

    • Were any non-protocol materials used (lubricants, labels)?

  3. Environmental factors:

    • High room humidity (>60% RH): Hygroscopic BBO absorbs moisture faster

    • Dusty environment: Particulates accumulate on surfaces

    • Volatile organics in room air: Cleaning solvents, 3D printer fumes, etc.

  4. Crystal quality issues:

    • Some BBO crystals have intrinsic defects (inclusions, imperfect polish)

    • Cheap crystals may have inferior AR coatings that degrade faster

    • Verify crystal source: Buy from reputable suppliers (Eksma, Castech, Red Optronics)

Problem: BBO surface looks clean but power still degraded

Alternative failure modes (NOT contamination):

  1. Crystal damage:

    • Gray track or dark spot in beam path: Photodarkening or laser-induced damage

    • Cause: Excessive power density (>1 MW/cm² peak) or UV absorption

    • Solution: Replace crystal, reduce power or increase beam size

  2. Coating degradation:

    • AR coating may have delaminated or oxidized

    • Check: Measure reflection at entrance face (should be <0.5%)

    • Solution: Recoat or replace crystal

  3. Thermal lensing:

    • Crystal temperature drifting: Phase-matching bandwidth exceeded

    • Check: Monitor phase-matching temperature over time

    • Solution: Improve oven temperature stability, increase oven thermal mass

  4. Mechanical misalignment:

    • Cavity mirrors have shifted due to thermal expansion or vibration

    • Check: Re-optimize cavity alignment, measure finesse

    • Solution: Improve mechanical stability, use more rigid mounts

Part 7: Advanced Topics

Nitrogen Purge System Design

When to implement: For >5,000 hour target lifetime or critical applications

Benefits:

  • Eliminates moisture (prevents hygroscopic contamination on BBO)

  • Continuously flushes outgassed organics (reduces deposition rate)

  • Reduces O₂ partial pressure (slows photochemical polymerization)

  • Creates controlled, reproducible atmosphere

Simple design:

Components:

  • N₂ cylinder: Standard 50 L cylinder (€80-120, lasts 2-6 months)

  • Flow controller: Mass flow controller (MFC) or needle valve + rotameter (€100-500)

  • Particle filter: 0.2 μm inline filter (€50)

  • Moisture trap: Drierite or molecular sieve (€30, regenerate monthly)

  • Enclosure: Acrylic or polycarbonate box with gasketed ports (€200-500)

Flow rate:

  • 0.1 L/min: Gentle purge, 1-2 air changes per hour

  • 0.5 L/min: Moderate, 5-10 air changes per hour (recommended)

  • 1.0 L/min: Aggressive, 10-20 air changes per hour (may disturb cavity stability)

Operational cost:

  • N₂ consumption: 0.5 L/min × 60 min/hr × 730 hr/month = 21,900 L/month = 15 m³/month

  • Cost: 15 m³ × €3/m³ = €45/month

Performance impact:

  • BBO lifetime extension: 1.5-3× improvement over clean build without purge

  • Total system cost: +€800 (setup) + €45/month (operation)

Residual Gas Analysis (RGA) Monitoring

Purpose: Real-time monitoring of outgassing species

When practical: If you have access to RGA (ion trap labs often do)

Implementation:

  1. Connect small vacuum line to cavity enclosure (1/4" tube, <1 L/min flow)

  2. Pump line with turbomolecular pump to <10⁻⁶ Torr

  3. Insert RGA head in line

  4. Monitor mass spectrum (m/z = 1-100 amu)

What to look for:

  • m/z = 18 (H₂O): Moisture outgassing

  • m/z = 28, 44 (CO, CO₂): Organic decomposition

  • m/z = 43, 57, 71 (CₓHᵧ fragments): Hydrocarbon outgassing (oils, epoxy)

  • m/z = 73, 147, 207, 281 (siloxanes): Silicone rubber outgassing

Acceptance criteria:

  • After full bake-out: Background pressure <10⁻⁷ Torr

  • Hydrocarbon peaks <1% of total signal

  • If criteria not met: Extend bake time or identify unclean component

Part 8: Quick Reference Tables

Material Selection Cheat Sheet

Component
❌ AVOID
⚠️ ACCEPTABLE (with treatment)
✅ RECOMMENDED

Structural metal

Black anodized Al

Bare Al (Alodine coated)

Natural hard anodized Al

Electropolished SS 304/316

Insulator

Nylon, polycarbonate

PTFE (baked)

PEEK, Macor, alumina

Cable insulation

PVC

Silicone (pre-baked)

PTFE, Kapton

Adhesive

General epoxy, cyanoacrylate

EPO-TEK (standard cure)

EPO-TEK (extended bake)

Ceramabond 571 (inorganic)

Piezo

Unknown/cheap

Standard grade (pre-baked)

UHV-specified grade

Seals

Viton, Buna-N o-rings

Kalrez (pre-baked, remote)

Metal C-rings, Conflat Cu gaskets

Outgassing Rate Reference

Material/Treatment
Outgassing @ 25°C (Torr·L/s/cm²)
Time to Monolayer on BBO @ 50°C

Black anodized Al (untreated)

10⁻⁶ to 10⁻⁵

10-50 hours

Machining oil residue

10⁻⁶

50 hours

PVC cable insulation

10⁻⁵

10 hours

Standard piezo stack

10⁻⁷

500 hours

EPO-TEK (standard cure)

10⁻⁷

500 hours

Natural anodized Al

10⁻⁹

5,000 hours

Cleaned + baked metal

10⁻⁹

5,000 hours

EPO-TEK (extended bake)

10⁻¹²

5,000,000 hours

UHV-grade piezo

10⁻⁹

5,000 hours

PEEK, PTFE

10⁻⁹ to 10⁻⁸

1,000-5,000 hours

Stainless steel (electropolished)

10⁻¹⁰

50,000 hours

Cleaning Protocol Checklist

Use this checklist for every cavity build:

  • [ ] All metal parts identified and inventoried

  • [ ] Black anodized parts replaced or baked at 200°C

  • [ ] Ultrasonic cleaning: Acetone → IPA → DI water

  • [ ] Thermal bake: 200°C / 2-4 hours

  • [ ] Dragon's breath test passed

  • [ ] Adhesive bonds: Standard cure completed

  • [ ] Extended post-cure: 150°C / 24 hours

  • [ ] Vacuum bake: 100-120°C / 48-72 hours @ <10⁻⁵ Torr

  • [ ] RGA verified (if available): <10⁻¹⁴ Torr·L/s

  • [ ] Piezos pre-baked (if standard grade)

  • [ ] Piezos encapsulated with Al foil

  • [ ] All cables PTFE or Kapton (no PVC)

  • [ ] No elastomer seals within 20 cm of crystals

  • [ ] Assembly in clean environment (ISO 6-7)

  • [ ] Handled only with powder-free gloves

  • [ ] Documentation complete (photos, batch numbers, test data)

Part 9: Learning Resources and References

Foundational Reading

For BSc students (Introduction level):

[1] Hecht, Optics, 5th ed., Chapter 6: "Optical materials" - Basics of optical coatings, absorption, scatter

[2] Demtröder, Laser Spectroscopy, Vol. 1, Chapter 5: "Nonlinear optics" - SHG theory, phase matching, conversion efficiency

[3] Saleh & Teich, Fundamentals of Photonics, Chapter 19: "Nonlinear optics" - Clear mathematical treatment of frequency doubling

For MSc students (Applications level):

[4] Boyd, Nonlinear Optics, 3rd ed., Chapter 2: "Wave-equation description of nonlinear optical interactions" - Rigorous treatment of SHG in crystals

[5] Siegman, Lasers, Chapter 27: "Nonlinear optical frequency conversion" - Cavity-enhanced SHG, impedance matching

[6] Friedenauer et al., "High power all solid state laser system near 280 nm," Appl. Phys. B 84, 371 (2006) - Real-world example of LBO + BBO system

For PhD students (Research level):

[7] Paschotta et al., "Bright squeezed light from a singly resonant frequency doubler," Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 3807 (1994) - Advanced cavity design, noise considerations

[8] Polzik & Kimble, "Frequency doubling with KNbO₃ in an external cavity," Opt. Lett. 16, 1400 (1991) - Classic paper on external cavity SHG

Contamination and Materials Science

[9] Rettner et al., "Contamination of optical surfaces by organic vapors," Appl. Opt. 26, 3402 (1987) - Foundational study of organic contamination mechanisms

[10] LIGO Technical Note T1500200, "Materials for use in LIGO vacuum systems" - Gold standard for UHV materials selection (available: dcc.ligo.org)

[11] NASA Reference Publication 1124, "Outgassing data for selecting spacecraft materials" - Database of outgassing rates (available: outgassing.nasa.gov)

[12] Agrawal & Menzel, "Contamination of grazing incidence optics," Opt. Eng. 32, 1593 (1993) - Photochemical contamination in UV systems

Surface Preparation and Cleaning

[13] Palik & Henck, "Effect of cleaning procedures on damage threshold of molybdenum mirrors," Appl. Opt. 23, 3796 (1984) - Demonstrates importance of proper cleaning

[14] Gwo et al., "Ultra-precision bonding for gravitational wave detectors," Class. Quantum Grav. 20, 853 (2003) - Hydroxide-catalysis bonding (related to precision assembly)

Product Data Sheets (Essential References)

[15] EPO-TEK 353ND Technical Data Sheet - Available: www.epotek.com/docs/en/Datasheet/353ND.pdf

[16] EPO-TEK H74 Technical Data Sheet - Available: www.epotek.com/docs/en/Datasheet/H74.pdf

[17] Stycast 2850FT Technical Data Sheet - Available: Henkel technical support or distributors

[18] PI Ceramic, "Piezo actuators for UHV applications," Application Note - Available: www.piceramic.com (search "UHV")

Online Resources

[19] SNLO Software (Sandia National Labs) - Free nonlinear optics calculator: as-photonics.com/snlo

[20] LIDT Database (Laser-Induced Damage Threshold) - boulder.nist.gov/div815/lidt

[21] Thorlabs Educational Resources - www.thorlabs.com/tutorials.cfm (see "Optical Materials" and "Nonlinear Crystals")

Appendix A: Procurement Guide

Recommended Vendors

Optomechanical Hardware (Clean Options):

  • Thorlabs (www.thorlabs.com): Natural anodized option available on request

  • Newport/MKS (www.newport.com): Stainless steel stages, custom anodization

  • OptoSigma (www.optosigma.com): "Clean room grade" specification available

Adhesives:

  • Epoxy Technology (www.epotek.com): Direct manufacturer of EPO-TEK products

  • Henkel/Loctite (distributor: Ellsworth Adhesives): Stycast products

  • Thorlabs: Repackages EPO-TEK in smaller quantities (convenient for labs)

Piezos:

  • PI Ceramic (www.piceramic.com): PICMA® series, UHV options available

  • Noliac (www.noliac.com): NAC2000 series, UHV-compatible models

  • Thorlabs: PA series (standard), custom UHV builds on request

Nonlinear Crystals:

  • Eksma Optics (www.eksmaoptics.com): High-quality LBO, BBO, custom coatings

  • Castech (www.castech.com): Reliable Chinese supplier, good price/performance

  • Red Optronics (www.redoptronics.com): Premium crystals, tight specifications

Cables and Wire:

  • Omega Engineering (www.omega.com): Kapton-insulated thermocouple wire

  • Alpha Wire (www.alphawire.com): FIT-221 PTFE hook-up wire

  • Lakeshore Cryotronics (www.lakeshore.com): Low-outgassing Quadlead wire

Cleaning Supplies:

  • First Contact (www.photoniccleaning.com): Polymer cleaner for optics

  • Texwipe (www.texwipe.com): Cleanroom wipes, swabs

  • VWR/Sigma-Aldrich: Semiconductor-grade solvents

Appendix B: Institutional Knowledge Documentation Template

To be filled out for each new cavity built in your lab:

Summary: Three-Level Decision Framework

Level 1: Minimum Viable (For Short-Term Experiments, <500 hours)

Materials:

  • Natural anodized or bare aluminum (no black)

  • Standard-grade piezos with pre-bake

  • EPO-TEK adhesives with standard cure only

  • PTFE cables (no PVC)

Process:

  • Ultrasonic cleaning + 200°C bake of all metal parts

  • Standard adhesive cure (150°C / 1 hour)

  • Basic assembly hygiene (gloves, clean bench)

Expected outcome: 500-1,000 hours BBO lifetime, cleaning every 3-6 months

Investment: +€200-300 over "standard lab build"

Level 2: Publication-Quality (For PhD Projects, 2,000-5,000 hours)

Materials:

  • Natural hard anodized aluminum or stainless steel

  • UHV-grade piezos OR standard with full treatment

  • EPO-TEK adhesives with NASA outgassing certification

  • PTFE or Kapton cables throughout

Process:

  • Full cleaning protocol (ultrasonic + thermal bake)

  • Extended post-cure (150°C / 24 hours)

  • Vacuum bake (100-120°C / 48-72 hours)

  • Piezo encapsulation with Al foil

  • Assembly in ISO 6-7 environment

Expected outcome: 3,000-5,000 hours BBO lifetime, cleaning every 6-12 months

Investment: +€800-1,200 over standard build

Level 3: Commercial-Grade (For Shared Facilities, >10,000 hours)

Materials:

  • Electropolished stainless steel throughout

  • UHV-specified piezos only

  • Inorganic adhesives where possible (Ceramabond for thermistor)

  • Kapton-insulated wire, metal-body connectors

Process:

  • All Level 2 protocols

  • Nitrogen purge system

  • HEPA-filtered enclosure

  • RGA verification of outgassing

  • Regular contamination monitoring

Expected outcome: 8,000-15,000 hours BBO lifetime, cleaning >1 year

Investment: +€2,500-4,000 over standard build

Final Guidance for Students

Before you start building:

  1. Read this entire guide (2-3 hours)

  2. Read the Friedenauer et al. paper [6] for context

  3. Identify contamination sources in your planned design

  4. Calculate cost-benefit for your experimental timeline

  5. Get approval from supervisor for materials budget

During construction: 6. Follow protocols exactly (no shortcuts) 7. Document everything (photos, batch numbers, dates) 8. Test components before assembly (capacitance, outgassing if possible) 9. Allow 3 weeks for proper assembly (including bake times)

After first light: 10. Monitor power daily for first 100 hours (establish baseline) 11. Weekly monitoring afterward (plot trends) 12. Visual inspection of BBO after 500 hours (establish cleaning schedule) 13. Document performance in lab notebook (future reference)

Remember:

  • Contamination is cumulative and progressive

  • Early detection is much easier than late recovery

  • Materials choices matter 10× more than you initially think

  • Time invested in proper preparation pays back 100× in experimental stability

Good luck with your frequency doubling cavity!

Document version: 0.1 Last updated: 2025-12-03 Maintainer: U.Warring Feedback: Please contribute improvements via lab wiki or email

PreviousL–Introduction to Materials for Ultra-High Vacuum (UHV) ApplicationsNextL–Bonding of Optical Components in High-Power Laser Beam Paths

Last updated